Suzanne Adair and Ann Parker Chat It Up!

Today on Kaye Barley's blog "Meanderings and Muses," I chat with Ann Parker, author of the Silver Rush mystery series and a Relevant History guest. Stop by and find out what makes our female characters stand out and the influences in our lives that led us to create these characters. And do leave us a comment!

Incidentally, the latest book in Ann's series, Mercury's Rise, was just nominated for the Macavity Award!

*****

Did you like what you read? Learn about downloads, discounts, and special offers from Relevant History authors and Suzanne Adair. Subscribe to Suzanne's free newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Sizzle Into the Second Annual Week-Long Fourth of July Relevant History Book and Prize Giveaway!

In honor of Independence Day, 29 June – 5 July 2012, I’m posting an entire week of Relevant History essays. This year, we’re continuing the focus on the Southern theater of the Revolutionary War. My guests include authors of non-fiction and a historical military artist.

You know the drill. Read the essay, leave a comment, get the chance to win. Readers and history buffs, this is the place to hang out 29 June – 5 July.

Freedom to Read logoMy blog is one of several hundred lined up for the “Freedom to Read” hop that runs from 29 June – 5 July. When you click on this image here during that week, you can hop to any number of other blogs on the tour. Follow the directions on each blog, and earn the opportunity to win what they’re giving away. Lots of genres, lots of prizes. You could score big by the time the blog tour hops to its completion.

Here’s the lineup:

29 June: Suzanne Adair

30 June: Don Troiani

1 July: Peggy Earp

2 July: Don Hagist

4 July: John Buchanan

5 July: Suzanne Adair

Mark your calendars for 29 June – 5 July, and make sure you hop back to my blog then for a chance to win books and prizes on this tour.

**********

Did you like what you read? Learn about downloads, discounts, and special offers from Relevant History authors and Suzanne Adair. Subscribe to Suzanne’s free newsletter.

Enter your email address:

The Winner of Death Will Extend Your Vacation

Nancy Adams has won a copy of Death Will Extend Your Vacation by Elizabeth Zelvin. Congrats to Nancy!

Thanks to Elizabeth Zelvin for scoop on Christopher Columbus. Thanks, also, to everyone who visited and commented on Relevant History last week. Watch for another Relevant History post, coming soon.

*****

Did you like what you read? Learn about downloads, discounts, and special offers from Relevant History authors and Suzanne Adair. Subscribe to Suzanne’s free newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Truth and Lies in History: The Story of Columbus in America

LizZelvinAuthorPhoto1Relevant History welcomes Elizabeth Zelvin, a New York City psychotherapist whose latest contemporary mystery, Death Will Extend Your Vacation, is the third in the series featuring recovering alcoholic Bruce Kohler. Her short stories about a young marrano sailor on Columbus's first voyage have appeared in Ellery Queen's Mystery Magazine. Her YA novel about the second voyage is currently making the rounds. Three of Liz's short stories have been nominated for the Agatha Award and another for the Derringer Award. Liz has just released a CD of original songs, Outrageous Older Woman. For more information, check her author web site. Liz participates in group blogs at Poe's Deadly Daughters and SleuthSayers.

*****

I never expected to write historical fiction, but I woke up in the middle of the night about four years ago with a character knocking on the inside of my head and demanding to be let out so insistently that I had to tell his story. This was Diego, a young marrano sailor on Columbus's first voyage in 1492. I eventually wrote two stories that both appeared in Ellery Queen's Mystery Magazine: "The Green Cross," which was nominated for an Agatha Award for Best Short Story, and "Navidad." But Diego wasn't through with me, and he and his younger sister Rachel are the protagonists of Voyage of Strangers, a Young Adult novel set during the second voyage, from 1493 to 1495, that is still seeking a home.

How can I explain how Diego got into my head (unless you conclude I was channeling a real person, which I sometimes almost believe)? I knew what anybody knows about Columbus: a Genoese sponsored by King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella of Spain, he sailed west across the Atlantic, seeking a trade route to Asia, and found the Americas. He had three ships: the Niña, the Pinta, and the Santa Maria. Because I'm Jewish, I knew that the Jews were expelled from Spain on the very day that Columbus sailed: August 3, 1492. I knew that the marranos were the secret Jews who converted in order to save their lives and homes, otherwise forfeit to the Inquisition and the Crown. I knew that Europeans didn't believe the earth was flat, as I'd learned in school in the 1950s, and that there has been some recent speculation that Columbus and some of his crew might have been Jewish. In terms of the emotional truth of the characters I created, although I have fortunately experienced minimal anti-Semitism in my own life, I know how it feels to live as an outsider in a Christian society.

I had a stroke of luck in that the primary sources on Columbus and his voyages are few. We have portions of his own log book of the first voyage and a letter he wrote to the King and Queen to report his discovery; his biography, written by his son; a book by a Spaniard, Bartolomé de las Casas, an early settler in the New World who became violently opposed to the enslavement of the native Taino population; a letter from a childhood friend of Columbus (the only other Italian involved in the discovery) on the second voyage, with a smug, self-congratulatory description of how he raped a young Taino woman; and a description of the Taino beliefs by a friar who also participated in the second voyage.

Here are some of the things I learned in the course of my research for the stories and especially the YA novel:

  • Columbus lied. He kept two records of the fleet's day to day progress, one that he believed was accurate and a more optimistic one that he told the sailors, so they would not get too discouraged. Modern navigation has revealed that the lies were in fact closer to accurate.
  • Although Italian-Americans celebrate Columbus Day, this story is not about Italians. There were no Italians other than Columbus on the first voyage and his brothers and his buddy the rapist on the second. The story of the discovery is about Spain, its desire for wealth and expansion, and its determined persecution by expulsion, enslavement, and genocide of all who were not Christian, including the Jews, the Taino, the Moors, the Guanche of the Canary Islands, and the Roma.
  • The Santa Maria never made it home. She ran onto shoals on a calm, moonlit night off Hispaniola on Christmas Eve, 1492, when the whole crew was asleep after a drunken three-day party with the Taino. 
  • No way was Columbus Jewish. His own writings are infused with his devout Catholicism. Nor were the crew. Eighty-seven of the ninety men on the first voyage are known to history by name. Most came from the fishing village of Palos. Only three were even close to jailbirds (another apocryphal tale). One proponent of Columbus's Jewishness were a respected Jewish scholar who claims Columbus was seeking a homeland for the Jews (not likely for several reasons); the other was an anti-Semitic Spanish fascist writing in 1939 (in the context of Franco's alliance with Hitler), who argued that Columbus's greed for gold indicated he must have "Jewish blood." 
  • It's not primarily disease that killed off the Taino, as is often said. They were systematically slaughtered and enslaved from the second voyage on. By 1496, one-third of them were already dead. Many committed suicide (with cyanide extracted from their staple food, the yuca) rather than be killed or captured by the Spaniards. Early in 1495, 1,500 of them were rounded up, 500 of the "best" loaded into the holds of the returning ships, and the others handed over to the settlers as slaves. By the time the ships made landfall, 200 were dead.

What makes me so self-confident in my conclusions and interpretations? A whole body of speculation and opinion has been built on the slim foundation of the handful of primary sources. Each historian chose what to believe and what not to believe, and so do I. A recent PBS special trotted out the story that the navigational genius on the first voyage was not Columbus, but Martín Alonso Pinzón, the captain of the Pinta. The primary source for that is legal documents prepared for a suit the Pinzón family brought against Columbus—which they lost. So says historian and naval man Samuel Eliot Morison, who in his own sailboat followed the course of all four voyages, using Columbus's log as a guide. He says Columbus was the navigational genius, and I choose to believe him.

*****

LizZelvinBookCover1A big thanks to Elizabeth Zelvin. To someone who contributes a comment on my blog this week, she'll give away an advanced review copy of her contemporary mystery Death Will Extend Your Vacation in trade paperback format or a copy of the Ellery Queen's Mystery Magazine issue that includes her Agatha award-nominated short story about Diego and Columbus, "The Green Cross." Winner's choice! I'll choose the winner from among those who comment by Sunday at 6 p.m. ET. Delivery is available in the U.S. and Canada.

*****

Did you like what you read? Learn about downloads, discounts, and special offers from Relevant History authors and Suzanne Adair. Subscribe to Suzanne's free newsletter.

Enter your email address:

The Winner of Murder Manhattan Style

Ramona DeFelice Long has won a copy of Murder Manhattan Style by Warren Bull. Congrats to Ramona!

Thanks to Warren Bull for an entertaining look at the impulsive side of Abraham Lincoln. Thanks, also, to everyone who visited and commented on Relevant History this week. Watch for another Relevant History post, coming soon.

*****

Did you like what you read? Learn about downloads, discounts, and special offers from Relevant History authors and Suzanne Adair. Subscribe to Suzanne's free newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Abraham Lincoln’s Duel

WarrenBullAuthorPhoto Relevant History welcomes back Warren Bull, award-winning author of two novels on Kindle about Abraham Lincoln as an attorney (Abraham Lincoln for the Defense and Death in the Moonlight), plus a collection of historically-themed short stories, Murder Manhattan Style. His Young Adult novel, Heartland, about a family living in "Bleeding Kansas," is available on Kindle and, in paperback, from Avignon Press. His short stories have been published in several anthologies and other venues including Alfred Hitchcock's Mystery Magazine, Sniplits, The Back Alley, and Mysterical-E. For more information, check his web site and group blog.

*****

As unlikely as it sounds, Abraham Lincoln was once involved in a duel…almost. In the early morning of September 22, 1842 Lincoln crossed the Mississippi river to a small island named "Bloody Island" where he was prepared to meet James Shields who had challenged him to a duel that could prove fatal to either or both of men.

Although Lincoln and Shields were members of different political parties, they worked harmoniously together in the state legislature. They found a practical way to get needed legislation that helped save state banks during a dire financial situation. 

However, when Shields became state auditor, he made a series of decisions that many thought were foolish. For example, he issued a proclamation that county tax collectors should only accept gold and silver in payment for taxes and school debt. Lincoln and others thought that was especially hard on the indigent who had limited access to hard cash.

Lincoln wrote a number of anonymous letters to a newspaper editor using his well-honed sarcasm and satire to criticize his political opponent. Possibly in an effort to impress Mary Todd, the critique quickly turned from the political to the personal. Mary Todd and her friend Julia Jayne began sending anonymous letters of their own, which further upped the ante, and the level of venom, referring to Shields at one point as, "…overly pompous, a hypocrite and a liar." 

Other letters followed recounting fictitious social situations and painting Shields as wholly inadequate with the ladies. 

Lincoln told the newspaper editor not to mention the role of the two women. When Shields demanded to know who had written the letters, the editor gave Shields only Lincoln's name. Shields was appalled that his former friend had been responsible for such insulting, outrageous allegations. He sent Lincoln a letter demanding an immediate retraction of all charges. Lincoln reacted to the hostile tone of the letter by refusing to apologize until Shields sent a more "gentlemanly" epistle. Shield's response was to challenge his political rival to a duel.

Although dueling was illegal in Illinois, it was still actively practiced. Anyone refusing to defend his honor would be considered a coward by the general public, which could end a political career.

As the challenged party Lincoln had the right to set the conditions for the conflict. He made the strangest demands for any duel any time and anywhere. Lincoln insisted on a combat "pit" ten feet across by twelve feet long with a board hammered sideways into the middle of the fighting ground that neither man could step over on pain of death. He also insisted on "Cavalry Broadswords of the largest size" as the weapons. This gave Lincoln at 6' 4" a tremendous advantage over Shields who was 5' 9" tall.

Both stubborn and brave Shields accepted the conditions and showed up for the confrontation.

Lincoln demonstrated his advantage by hacking away at branches of a Willow tree on Shield's side of the pit but well beyond Shields' reach. Their seconds worked out a settlement in which Lincoln admitted authorship (including for the letters he had not written) and stated he "…had no intention of injuring your [Shields] personal or private character or standing as a man or a gentleman." By some accounts, by the time Lincoln and Shields returned to the Illinois side of the river they were already joking with each other about the cancelled swordfight.

Despite the risk of bloodshed and the absurdities involved, there was a lesson to be learned. Lincoln was never again as reckless or as harsh in his criticism of others. He became more aware of the possible consequences of intemperate language. He and Shields renewed their friendship and remained close for the rest of their lives. Shields later served as a Brigadier General in the Union Army.

Over time Lincoln became increasingly embarrassed about the duel. Later in life he refused to even discuss it.

*****

WarrenBullBookCover A big thanks to Warren Bull. He'll give away a paperback copy of Murder Manhattan Style to someone who contributes a comment on my blog this week. I'll choose the winner from among those who comment by Sunday at 6 p.m. ET. Delivery is available within the U.S. only.

*****

Did you like what you read? Learn about downloads, discounts, and special offers from Relevant History authors and Suzanne Adair. Subscribe to Suzanne's free newsletter.

Enter your email address:

The Winner of The Hanover Square Affair

Jolie Beaumont has won a copy of The Hanover Square Affair by Ashley Gardner. Congrats to Jolie!

Thanks to Ashley Gardner for an excellent overview of the crime-fighting agencies operating in Regency London. Thanks, also, to everyone who visited and commented on Relevant History this week. Watch for another Relevant History post, coming soon.

*****

Did you like what you read? Learn about downloads, discounts, and special offers from Relevant History authors and Suzanne Adair. Subscribe to Suzanne's free newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Crime Fighting in Regency London

Ashley Gardner author photoRelevant History welcomes historical mystery author Ashley Gardner, pen name for New York Times and USA Today bestselling author Jennifer Ashley. She has published nearly 40 novels and a dozen novellas since 2002. Her novels have been nominated for numerous awards, including RT BookReviews Reviewer’s Choice award for Best Historical Novel (which she won for The Sudbury School Murders). She has penned seven novels and a novella (thus far) in the Captain Lacey Regency Mystery series. When not writing books, Ashley enjoys cooking, hiking, and building dollhouses and dollhouse miniatures. For more information, check her web site and author blog, and follow her on Facebook and Twitter.

*****

One reason I enjoy writing historical crime fiction (and indeed, reading it) is that I’m fascinated by crime detection before fingerprinting, DNA tests, police databases, and other modern technology. I’m even more fascinated by the people who did this crime detecting, often very well and with good results.

The Hanover Square Affair book coverMy mystery series (The Captain Lacey Regency mysteries, beginning with The Hanover Square Affair) is set in London in 1816 and beyond. This period predates Robert Peel’s 1829 police reform that established a regular police force.

In my time period, 1816, several bodies of men worked under different jurisdictions to solve crimes and arrest criminals: The Watch, the Runners, and the Thames River Police. The City of London (the square mile) had its own constables, who didn’t much like interference from those patrolling the rest of metropolitan London

The most famous of the pre-Peel police are the Bow Street Runners. In my series, Captain Lacey’s former sergeant, Milton Pomeroy, becomes one of these elite patrollers, loves getting his convictions, and often calls upon Gabriel Lacey, now a private citizen, to help him out.

A short history of the Bow Street Runners: In 1750, Henry Fielding, magistrate of the Bow Street house (as well as the author of Tom Jones), put in motion a plan to employ six permanent constables at the Bow Street magistrate’s house. Unlike parish constables, who took up constable duties for a year (or paid others to do it for them), “Mr. Fielding’s People” would be more or less permanent employees.

The first Runners (who were not called “Runners” until about 1790) were not paid a salary or stipend; they received rewards for the conviction of criminals. They did not patrol, but investigated crimes that were reported to them.

Sir John Fielding, Henry Fielding’s half-brother, took over the Bow Street office in 1754 and remained there until 1779. Blind since the age of 20, Sir John Fielding took “Mr. Fielding’s People” and built them into an elite, highly respected detective force.

Under Sir John, the Runners were paid a salary in addition to collecting rewards; the magistrates began to receive stipends and sit regular hours. The Bow Street office also began to be used as a clearinghouse for information. Newssheets and journals (including The Hue and Cry or Weekly Pursuit, established by John Fielding in 1772), listed information on wanted criminals and stolen property, and was distributed throughout the country.

A quote from the Weekly Pursuit:

John Godfrey, pretends to be a clergyman, middle-sized, thin visaged, smooth face, ruddy cheeks, his eyes inflamed, a large white wig, bandy-legged, charged with fraud at Chichester.

Bow Street Runners were allowed to pursue criminals or track down missing persons outside of London, something that parish constables or the Watch could not do.

In 1792, the Middlesex Justices Act established seven magistrates houses in addition to Bow Street. Each house had three magistrates and six constables (called Runners in Bow Street, in other houses they might be referred to as Runners, constables, or officers).

The Runners issued warrants for arrest, brought in suspects, and investigated reported crimes. They did not patrol or walk a beat—the Runners only investigated or arrested a suspect once someone (usually the victim or friend/family of the victim), arrived at the magistrate’s office to report a crime.

Runners/constables at the magistrates’ houses were often hired by victims of crimes to hunt down offenders, or to find missing persons. Runners also continued to be given rewards by the magistrates’ office for the conviction of criminals. They were rewarded only when the suspect was convicted of a crime, not simply caught and arrested (although private citizens could pay the Runner for bringing a suspect to the magistrate).

Each magistrate’s house by 1815 employed foot patrollers who assisted the magistrates and the Runners. The foot patrollers actually patrolled in the streets of metropolitan London, while mounted patrollers covered the roads leading to London.

Another branch of crime fighters that greatly interests me is the Thames River Police. In The Glass House (Book 3 of the Captain Lacey Regency Mysteries), I introduce a Thames River Policeman who asks Captain Lacey to help him identify a body pulled out of the river.

The Thames River Police, sometimes called the Marine Police, or simply, the River Police, was sponsored and formed in 1798 by West India merchants and based at Wapping New Stairs. The Marine Police would patrol the Thames River and prevent theft from the merchantmen and docks along the river as well as the warehouses in which goods were stored.

The new police were so successful that, in 1800, the merchant companies (including the East India Company, the West India merchants, United States traders and others), backed a bill to let the government take over the running of the operation. Patrick Colquhoun, a magistrate who had many ideas for police reform, lobbied the government and persuaded them to bring the Thames River Police under their jurisdiction.

The Thames River Police continued to operate throughout the Regency and were incorporated into Robert Peel’s metropolitan police in 1839. (Note that though the metropolitan police began in 1829, the Thames River Police ran under the old system until 1839.)

And the Watch? The much-maligned Watch was created in the late 17th century in London and its boroughs. Unlike the magistrate system, which was set up and regulated by the Home Office, each parish within London was given full control over their Watch. Each parish decided how many men to hire, how much to pay them, how much to supervise them, and what the watchmen would do.

The quality of the Watch in any given part of London depended, of course, on the financial ability of that parish. The Watch system was completely replaced in 1829–30 by the new constables of the Metropolitan Police.

I thoroughly enjoy researching crime-fighting in Regency London—there is much more to it than the little bit I’ve touched on here, but I hope I’ve provided an interesting overview.

*****

A Death in Norfolk book coverA big thanks to Ashley Gardner. She’ll give away a print or electronic copy of the first Captain Lacey mystery, The Hanover Square Affair (re-released edition) or the newest book, A Death in Norfolk, to someone who contributes a comment on my blog this week. I’ll choose the winner from among those who comment by Sunday at 6 p.m. ET. International delivery is available.

**********

Did you like what you read? Learn about downloads, discounts, and special offers from Relevant History authors and Suzanne Adair. Subscribe to Suzanne’s free newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Happy Friday the 13th! Camp Follower is Free!

AdairCampFollowerCoverLoResIt's Friday the 13th, your lucky day! Camp Follower is free in Kindle format 13 April from Amazon. Free today only. This stand-alone historical mystery/thriller is the third book of my "Mysteries of the American Revolution" trilogy and was nominated for the Daphne du Maurier Award and the Sir Walter Raleigh Award. Download a copy for yourself now!

A deadly assignment. A land poisoned by treachery and battle. She plunged in headfirst.

Late in 1780, the publisher of a loyalist magazine in Wilmington, North Carolina offers an amazing assignment to Helen Chiswell, his society page writer. Pose as the widowed, gentlewoman sister of a British officer in the Seventeenth Light Dragoons, travel to the encampment of the British Legion in the Carolina backcountry, and write a feature on Lieutenant Colonel Banastre Tarleton. But Helen's publisher has secret reasons for sending her into danger. And because Helen, a loyalist, has ties to a family the redcoats suspect as patriot spies, she comes under suspicion of a brutal, brilliant British officer. At the bloody Battle of Cowpens, Helen must confront her past to save her life.

(Feel even more lucky today when you visit the book bonanza where Camp Follower is one of about 100 free ebooks showcased. But hurry! They're free today only!)

UPDATE: Huzzah! Camp Follower is #2 for Historical Mysteries and #3 for Spy Stories & Tales of Intrigue. Thank you!

*****

Did you like what you read? Learn about downloads, discounts, and special offers from Relevant History authors and Suzanne Adair. Subscribe to Suzanne's free newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Paper Woman: Available in Paperback + ebook Price Slashed to 99 Cents

AdairPaperWomanCoverEbook96dpiPaper Woman: A Mystery of the American Revolution is now available in paperback form as well as an ebook. Want an autographed bookplate for Paper Woman or my other books? Email your name and address to suzanneadair (at) gmail (dot) com.

And check out the ebook price of Paper Woman, slashed to 99 cents for a limited time in Nook, Kindle, and other formats!

*****

Did you like what you read? Learn about downloads, discounts, and special offers from Relevant History authors and Suzanne Adair. Subscribe to Suzanne's free newsletter.

Enter your email address: