The Winner of Abraham Lincoln for the Defense

Henry Zecher has won a copy of Abraham Lincoln for the Defense by Warren Bull. Congrats, Henry!

Thanks to Warren Bull for a reminder of why we shouldn’t judge historical figures by 21st-century standards. Thanks, also, to everyone who visited and commented on Relevant History this week. Watch for another Relevant History post, coming soon.

*****

Did you like what you read? Learn about downloads, discounts, and special offers from Relevant History authors and Suzanne Adair. Subscribe to Suzanne’s free newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Was Abraham Lincoln a Racist?

WarrenBullAuthorPhoto Relevant History welcomes Warren Bull, award-winning author of more than twenty published short stories as well as memoirs, essays, and the novel Abraham Lincoln for the Defense. His most recent work is a collection of short stories entitled Murder Manhattan Style from Ninth Month Publishing, Co. For more information, check his web site and group blog.

*****

The argument that Abraham Lincoln was racist is usually based upon his words during the Lincoln-Douglas Debates of 1858 and his suggestion that Blacks be relocated to Africa since he doubted that Whites and Blacks could live together in harmony. There is no doubt that at Charleston and Quincy Lincoln expressed his belief in the superiority of the white race.

In Lincoln’s words, “I have no purpose to introduce political and social equality between the white and the black races. There is a physical difference between the two, which, in my judgment, will probably forever forbid their living together upon a foot of perfect equality, and in as much as it becomes a necessity that there must be a difference, I as well as Judge Douglas, am in favor of the race to which I belong having the superior position.”

If a candidate for the Senate used those words today, there is no doubt the candidate would be accused of and, in fact, guilty of racism. If a candidate for the Senate today used the words of Stephen A. Douglas in 1858, the candidate would offend everyone except the very most extreme members of the American political spectrum. If a physician today practiced what was the most advanced medicine of 1858, there is no doubt that the physician would be guilty of malpractice. He or she would be ignorant about germs and unable to save anyone whose appendix burst. I certainly would not trust my auto repair business to the most skilled blacksmith of 1858. If medicine and engineering advance in 150 years, should we be surprised that our ideas about human rights have changed?

In contrast to Douglas and the Supreme Court of his time, Lincoln also said, “There is no reason in the world why the negro is not entitled to all the natural rights enumerated in the Declaration of Independence — the right to life liberty and he pursuit of happiness. I hold he is as much entitled to these as the white man.”

In 1858 Lincoln did not view the races as equal. Unlike Douglas, who compared enslaved people to farm produce, Lincoln saw enslaved people as human, not property. For that time he was more devoted to human rights than the great majority of Americans.

Fortunately, Lincoln lived beyond 1858 and served as president during the Civil War, preserving the Union, and over time, transforming the country and his own thinking. He abandoned the idea of relocating Blacks to Africa. Lincoln enforced anti-slave trading laws. He abolished slavery in the District of Columbia. He wrote the Emancipation Proclamation, introducing the idea of freeing enslaved people en mass. He recruited Blacks for the army; an estimated 200,000 served and 30,000 died. Lincoln insisted that black soldiers receive equal pay with white soldiers, and cited their bravery as a reason to end of slavery and a reason they should be given the right to vote. It has been suggested that he was assassinated not for what he had done but for what he planned to do to extend rights to all people.

Lincoln was a man of his times and a man for all times. He was not perfect. He did not escape the prejudices of the general populations. On the other hand, he learned from his mistakes. He had a heart and mind that, once fixed upon a goal, remained steadfast in spite of all opposition. Perhaps abolitionist Frederick Douglass who knew Lincoln personally expressed it best on the occasion of his Oration In Memory of Abraham Lincoln in 1876:

I have said that President Lincoln was a white man, and shared the prejudices common to his countrymen towards the colored race. Looking back to his times and to the condition of his country, we are compelled to admit that this unfriendly feeling on his part may be safely set down as one element of his wonderful success in organizing the loyal American people for the tremendous conflict before them, and bringing them safely through that conflict. His great mission was to accomplish two things: first, to save his country from dismemberment and ruin; and, second, to free his country from the great crime of slavery. To do one or the other, or both, he must have the earnest sympathy and the powerful cooperation of his loyal fellow-countrymen. Without this primary and essential condition to success his efforts must have been vain and utterly fruitless. Had he put the abolition of slavery before the salvation of the Union, he would have inevitably driven from him a powerful class of the American people and rendered resistance to rebellion impossible. Viewed from the genuine abolition ground, Mr. Lincoln seemed tardy, cold, dull, and indifferent; but measuring him by the sentiment of his country, a sentiment he was bound as a statesman to consult, he was swift, zealous, radical, and determined.”

*****

A big thanks to Warren Bull. He’ll give away a print copy of Abraham Lincoln for the Defense to someone who contributes a comment on my blog this week. I’ll choose the winner from among those who comment by Sunday at 6 p.m. ET. Delivery is available within the U.S. only.

*****

Did you like what you read? Learn about downloads, discounts, and special offers from Relevant History authors and Suzanne Adair. Subscribe to Suzanne’s free newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Encore of “The Things We Do For Research”

Today Writers Who Kill posts my essay “The Things We Do For Research.” If you missed the essay when it was originally posted on “Meanderings and Muses,” please join us today, learn what crazy hoops writers of mysteries, suspense, and thrillers jump through to conduct research, and let us know what you think. Thanks for this opportunity.

*****

Did you like what you read? Learn about downloads, discounts, and special offers from Relevant History authors and Suzanne Adair. Subscribe to Suzanne’s free newsletter.

Enter your email address:

The Winner of Circle of Dishonor by Gwen Mayo

Shirley Nienkark has won a copy of Circle of Dishonor by Gwen Mayo. Congrats, Shirley!

Thanks to Gwen Mayo for a look at the post-Civil War Kentucky we don’t read about in history textbooks. Thanks, also, to everyone who visited and commented on Relevant History this week. Watch for another Relevant History post, coming soon.

*****

Did you like what you read? Learn about downloads, discounts, and special offers from Relevant History authors and Suzanne Adair. Subscribe to Suzanne’s free newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Kentucky in the Decades of Discord

GwenMayoAuthorPhoto01 Relevant History welcomes historical mystery author Gwen Mayo. Mayo grew up in the hills of Eastern Kentucky, but moved to Lexington in order to study politics and history at the University of Kentucky. She is a member of the Short Mystery Fiction Society, Sisters in Crime, and the Historical Novel Society. Her debut novel, Circle of Dishonor, set in post-Civil War Kentucky, was published by Pill Hill Press in July 2010. For more information, check her web site and blog.

*****

GwenMayoBookCover When I decided to write historical mysteries set in Kentucky, it wasn’t difficult for me to choose a period. Civil War and post-Civil War Kentucky are filled with murder. The years between the Civil War and the turn of the century are called the “Decades of Discord.” It is a time when Kentucky was the most violent place in America. Much of that violence is rooted in our unique position during the Civil War.

Many Americans think Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation freed the slaves in the United States. It didn’t. The Emancipation Proclamation was a combination of political maneuvering and war propaganda. Lincoln freed the slaves in Confederate states, which was essentially another country. Kentucky and Delaware, the two slave holding states that did not join the Confederacy, remained slave states until 1865, when the 13th Amendment to the Constitution was ratified.

Kentucky refused to ratify the 13th Amendment until 1970. Kentucky would have been the last state to officially ratify the 13th Amendment, but Mississippi overlooked notifying the federal government of its vote to ratify until 1995. We Kentuckians would like to officially thank Mississippi for that oversight. It makes us look better.

When it comes to violence, Kentucky needs all the help it can get in improving its image. Last year our state legislature again introduced a bill to remove the dueling language from our oath of office. Legislators have introduced similar bills forty times, but still must choose between public service and defending their honor. Duels were so prevalent in Kentucky that in 1891 legislators attempted to curb the practice by including the following in Kentucky’s Oath of Office:

I, being a citizen of this State, have not fought a duel with deadly weapons within this State nor out of it, nor have I sent or accepted a challenge to fight a duel with deadly weapons, nor have I acted as second in carrying a challenge, nor aided or assisted any person thus offending, so help me God.”

The debate about removing this language from the oath centers on the preservation of tradition and the quaint language of the oath, versus the embarrassment of having to say this in front of witnesses who snicker when they hear the words. As usual, tradition trumped shame.

I would personally support allowing duels as a way of toning down the rhetoric in public office. Campaigns today would be a lot less likely to indulge in mud slinging if the opponents faced the consequences with deadly force, but I digress. This is about Kentucky’s “readjustment” and how it helped escalate violence statewide.

“Readjustment” is uniquely Kentuckian. Officially, Kentucky was part of the Union, but the federal government could not ignore the divided loyalties of her citizens or the fact that Kentucky was a slave state. Washington was also unwilling to turn a blind eye to the former Confederates being reelected to public office after fighting to overthrow the government. The problem was, they had no legal standing to impose “reconstruction” on a state that remained in the Union. The solution those esteemed members of Congress came up with was a period of “readjustment” to “help” the state control some of the chaos caused by having 100,000 newly freed slaves achieve full citizenship.

It worked about as well as most government solutions: hate for Washington and the Union Army increased to the point that visitors would be hard-pressed to find a Kentuckian willing to admit to ever supporting the Union.

Kentucky’s readjustment foreshadowed two enduring themes in American race relations: the belief by whites that blacks must be kept in “their place,” and the determination of blacks to attain equality at any cost. In the nineteenth century the cost was exponential. Within ten years of the war, Central Kentucky was firmly Southern and the rest of the state claimed to be Southern with varying degrees of success. With the increase in self-identification with the Confederacy came an increase in violence against blacks. In the first ten years following the war, there were 149 reported lynchings. That number grew to an average of 100 lynchings per year for each of the last 20 years of the nineteenth century.

There are no accurate records for the number of deaths from other types of violence. The departure of the military left a vacuum in law enforcement. That vacuum was quickly filled by vigilante groups. Regulators, the Ku Klux Klan, the Knights of the Golden Circle, Mountain Militias, and other semi-secret groups were at work throughout the latter half of the nineteenth century.

Black churches, the center of newly formed black communities, were burned. In Frankfort, the state capitol, every home in the black community was set ablaze. Klansmen shot men, women, children, even family pets as terrified residents tried to escape the flames.

In the aftermath of this incident, not a single arrest was made.

Although conditions were much harder for blacks, the violence in Kentucky wasn’t limited to racial violence. Klan and Regulator activity created an atmosphere of fear in all racial and social classes. Kentucky Klan and Regulator organizations were not synonymous; the groups split along political lines. Southern sympathizers joined the Klan, returning Union soldiers often joined the Regulators. Feuds broke out in the mountains, sometimes wiping out entire families. Judge John Elliott, a member of the state supreme court, was assassinated in broad daylight in front of 800 witnesses. The killer confessed, but was sent to an asylum instead of prison because there wasn’t a single witness brave enough to dispute his version of the shooting. Perhaps the most telling legacy of Kentucky’s long violent history was the assassination of Governor William Goebel in 1900. Kentucky still remains the only state to have ever assassinated a sitting governor.

***

A big thanks to Gwen Mayo. She’ll give away a print copy of Circle of Dishonor to someone who contributes a comment on my blog this week. I’ll choose the winner from among those who comment by Friday at 6 p.m. ET. Delivery is available within the U.S. and Canada.

*****

Did you like what you read? Learn about downloads, discounts, and special offers from Relevant History authors and Suzanne Adair. Subscribe to Suzanne’s free newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Blog Tour de Force

BTDF_April_2011_logo The Indie Book Collective (IBC) is a group of independently published authors who harness the scope of the Internet and the power of social media to get their work before readers. They share tips on publishing and marketing, and host workshops and blog tours.

I'm participating in the IBC's Blog Tour de Force 18 – 25 April. Paper Woman, winner of the Patrick D.Smith Literature Award, will be featured 21 April. More details coming soon on this exciting opportunity!

The Winner of Watch the Hour by J. R. Lindermuth

Holly Wright has won a copy of Watch the Hour by J. R. Lindermuth. Congrats, Holly!

Thanks to J. R. Lindermuth for a look at Irish immigrants, the Molly Maguires, railroad barons, and coal miners in 19th-century Pennsylvania. Thanks, also, to everyone who visited and commented on Relevant History last week. Watch for another Relevant History post, coming soon.

LuckyLeprechaunBlogTour Special thanks to the folks at I Am A Reader, Not A Writer and Books Complete Me, who organized the Lucky Leprechaun Giveaway Hop 17 – 20 March. The British Are Coming, Y'All! was one of more than two hundred blogs and web sites in the Hop.

Romeo and Juliet in the Coal Region

LuckyLeprechaunBlogTour Welcome to The British Are Coming, Y’all! Today through Sunday 20 March are lucky days for you. My blog is participating in the “Lucky Leprechaun Giveaway Hop” along with more than 250 other blogs listed at the end of this post. All blogs in the hop are offering a book related giveaway, and we’re all linked, so you can easily hop from one giveaway to another. To find out how to qualify for the giveaway on this blog, read through today’s Relevant History post below and follow the directions. Then hop to another blog. Enjoy!

 

JRLindermuthAuthorPhoto Relevant History welcomes author J. R.Lindermuth, a retired newspaper editor. Lindermuth was born and raised in Pennsylvania’s anthracite coal region. He’s the author of eight novels, and his stories and articles have been published in a variety of magazines, both print and on line. He writes a weekly historical column for two area newspapers and is librarian of his county historical society, where he assists patrons with genealogy and research.  For more information, check his web site.

***

JRLindermuthBookCover My historical suspense novel Watch The Hour focuses on the conflict between mine owners and their employees — particularly the Irish — in the 1870s, in Pennsylvania’s anthracite coal region. My research corroborated the fact that prejudice never goes away, though the identity of the victims may change over time. Race and religion aren’t always the qualifying factors. Mere difference is enough to warrant suspicion.

More than a million Irish refugees flocked to the United States between 1846 and 1855. They worked whatever jobs they could find and were routinely exploited. Many found their way to Pennsylvania’s anthracite coal region, where they encountered some of the worst exploitation and hatred. Most of the management and skilled labor positions were held by the English and Welsh — old enemies.

In the 1870s, an expanding economic depression pitted mine owners and their laborers, particularly the Irish, in conflict over wages and working conditions. The situation spawned a wave of violence. The Irish and the Molly Maguires, a secret organization linked to them, soon became a scapegoat for those in authority.

Private police forces were commissioned by the state but paid by the coal companies, sworn to protect property of the mine owners. The miners believed their real purpose was to spy upon targeted agitators and intimidate and break up strikers.

The subject of the Molly Maguires is still controversial today, with many refusing to believe the organization existed or that its members were guilty of the crimes of which they were accused. Others believe they operated secretly and used the Ancient Order of Hibernians, a legitimate benevolent organization, as a front. Probably more atrocities attributed to the Mollies than occurred. But the organization’s existence is documented, and people do have a tendency to strike back at oppression.

The largest owner of coal lands was the Philadelphia and Reading Railroad, headed by Franklin B. Gowen. The P&R was a monopoly controlling the rail lines and the coal fields, and it was Gowen’s goal to control the workforce as well. The miners formed a union, the Workingmen’s Benevolent Association (WBA), and Gowen was determined to wipe it out.

Gowen’s opportunity came when a strike led to sabotage and then the murder of ten mine bosses. Gowen accused the WBA of harboring terrorists — the Molly Maguires. He manipulated the press to convince the public that most of the Irish were Mollies and responsible for the murders and sabotage.

The end result was a series of trials, which resulted in the conviction of forty-one people and the hanging of twenty miners. The WBA was crushed, and it was a long time before another union improved mine working conditions. At this late date it’s difficult to separate legitimate from false accusations.

I grew up hearing stories about those days from my grandfather and other older residents who had the stories passed down to them. Of the twenty men hanged, four were from my home area. Peter McManus was hanged in 1879 for the murder of Frederick Hesser. Patrick Hester, Patrick Tully and Peter McHugh were hanged in 1878 for the murder ten years earlier of Alexander Rea, a mine superintendent.

Hester, Tully and McHugh were brought to trial solely on the accusation of Daniel Kelly, an alcoholic known familiarly as Kelly the Bum. While jailed in Pottsville, Schuylkill County, Kelly confessed to his own involvement in Rea’s murder and turned state’s evidence on the other three in return for immunity.

Despite protests of innocence, the three were convicted and sentenced to hang on March 25, 1878 at Bloomsburg, Columbia County. The records testify the only ones who behaved properly that day were the Irishmen who accepted their fate calmly and with dignity, not even flinching when three pine coffins were dumped unceremoniously at the foot of the gallows as the nooses were being placed round the men’s necks.

The crowd that gathered to witness the hangings was reported as uncommonly large and unruly. A newspaper account said Sheriff John W. Hoffman was so drunk he was barely able to stand when he pulled the rope on Hester. A dozen spectators clambered onto the roof of a nearby chicken shed to watch, and it collapsed under their weight, smothering to death thirteen-year-old Sunny Williams. Farmer Joseph Engst became drunk and fell from the roof of the Exchange Hotel, crushing his skull. The boisterous crowd upset the buggy of William Yiengst, injuring his wife.

And, to top it off, someone stole Hester’s wedding ring before his body was stiff. The ring was later returned by Abby Engle, a railroader, who apologized that he’d been “carried away by the emotion of the day.”

Into this milieu in Watch the Hour, I introduce a young coal company police officer named Ben Yeager, a decent fellow who does his best to follow orders while trying to be fair to the workers whose lot he sees as little different from his own. Despite his efforts at fairness, his job makes him the enemy of the Irish. I complicate matters by having him fall in love with an Irish lass, Jennie. Like a certain young couple from Verona, these lovers must vie not just with family differences, but also with the society in which they dwell. And Ben faces the additional problem of being pressured by the mine owner to marry his granddaughter, who is also in love with the youth. For their love, Ben and Jennie risk the enmity of family and friends, their religion, their jobs, and their very lives.

Coal mining remains a tough and dangerous occupation. In contrast, the Irish are, for the most part, accepted and valued members of society in the United States today. But the prejudice they endured still exists and can be seen in the plight of other ethnic groups in the land.

***

A big thanks to J. R. Lindermuth. He’ll give away a print copy of Watch the Hour to someone who contributes a legitimate comment on my blog this week. I'll choose one winner from among those who comment by Sunday at 6 p.m. ET. Delivery is available within the U.S. only.



Revolutionary Portents

In the wake of the devastating earthquake and tsunami in Northern Japan on 11 March 2011, I wondered what extraordinary natural phenomena our foremothers and forefathers were exposed to during the Revolutionary War. Here’s a sampling of what I found.

Total Solar Eclipse

Total-solar-eclipse By the Revolutionary War, folks in Western civilization no longer believed that the sun was being “eaten” during a total eclipse. In fact, scientists could usually predict eclipses with a good deal of accuracy. George Washington knew in advance that the eclipse of 24 June 1778 was coming. By then, the Continental Army had emerged from the winter at Valley Forge and was assuming cohesion. The general, never one to pass up an opportunity, played up the eclipse as a portent that fortune would turn around for his army. The soldiers believed him and eventually proved him correct.

Hurricane

Hurricane_isabel The hurricane of September 1775 gouged a deadly path up the North American Atlantic coastline from North Carolina to Newfoundland, killing hundreds of people. Some meteorologists believe the storm made a loop in the ocean after first landfall, then returned to slam the mid-Atlantic coast a second time before plowing north. In 1775, no one could see hurricanes coming and prepare. Rebels and redcoats alike wondered what God had intended by such a ferocious portent.

Forest Fire

Forest-fire On 19 May 1780, residents of several New England towns reported an eerie reddish glow to the sunrise. A la Apocalypse, skies darkened over the course of the morning until the sun was obliterated by noon. Many people stopped working and sought solace in churches or taverns, where they expected to meet their Maker. But by the next day, visibility and sunlight had returned to normal. Analysis of tree rings in Eastern Ontario about 225 years later showed that a massive wildfire had occurred there in the Spring of 1780. Scientists now believe that smoke from the fire caused the mysterious mid-day darkness.

Comet_hale-bopp Although no earthquakes occurred during the Revolutionary War, there are records of an impressive earthquake 18 November 1755 in New England. Near Cambridge, MA, chasms appeared in the earth, and boats in the harbor crashed together. A tsunami from the quake apparently traveled all the way to the West Indies the same day and sucked water from a harbor in St. Martin. And comets, those classic historical harbingers, failed to decorate the Revolutionary night sky. However August – September of 1769, folks around the world were treated to the sight of a lovely comet that, at times, had six tails. Both Charles Messier and Captain James Cook remarked on this comet.

The more I read about history, the more it seems as though things don’t change all that much. During the Revolutionary War, we knew little about seismology, thus most people then would have labeled an earthquake like the one in Japan as a portent. In 2011, our knowledge of seismology is considerably greater. Yet many people still consider the earthquake in Japan a portent. Do you suppose the Mayan prediction of the end of civilization in 2012 predisposes us to believe in portents?

Don't forget to check back here later this week for more Relevant History and another chance to win books.

Blog Hop Coming Up

My blog is one of more than 250 lined up for the "Lucky Leprechaun Blog Hop" that runs from 17 – 20 March 2011. One week from today, on St. Patrick’s Day, I’ll post an Irish-themed Relevant History essay. You know the drill. Read the essay, leave a comment, and get the chance to win a free book.

This time, there’s more in it for you, my readers. Especially if your TBR pile is running low.

LuckyLeprechaunBlogTour Click on this image when you see it posted on the 17 March blog entry. This will allow you to hop to any number of other blogs on the tour. If you're feeling lucky, follow the directions on each blog, and earn the opportunity to win what they’re giving away. Lots of genres, lots of prizes. You could score big by the time the blog tour hops to its completion on 20 March.

So mark your calendars for 17 – 20 March, and make sure you hop back to my blog for a chance to win the first of many books on this tour.