The New Cover for Paper Woman

AdairPaperWomanCoverEbook96dpi Here's the new cover for the electronic version of Paper Woman, created by a professional artist. If you've read the book, you'll recall the scene that inspired this image. I'm also having cover images for The Blacksmith's Daughter and Camp Follower redone.

What do you think of this new cover?

In fiction, it's too easy to overlook the personal toll of war in favor of the sensationalism of battle. My intention with these new covers is to show a theme found in all three books: the negative effect of the Revolutionary War on individuals — in particular, on women. I believe that if we could hear more voices of women from the time of the Revolutionary War, they'd have a different tale to tell than the tale men have traditionally told.

The electronic version of Paper Woman is available for purchase from Amazon, Barnes and Noble, and Smashwords.

The Winner of Blue Bells of Scotland by Laura Vosika

Lea Wait has won a copy of Blue Bells of Scotland by Laura Vosika. Congrats, Lea!

Thanks to Laura Vosika for a look at Robert the Bruce and how we use the circumstances in our lives. And thanks to everyone who visited and commented on Relevant History this week. Watch for another Relevant History post, coming soon.

Do We Make Our Circumstances, or Do They Make Us?

LauraVosikaAuthorPhoto Relevant History welcomes author Laura Vosika. Vosika grew up in the military, experiencing European castles and the history of America's east coast. She earned degrees in music and education, and worked for years as both a freelance musician and music educator. In addition to finishing the Blue Bells Trilogy (historical/paranormal fiction and adventure), she has several other novels and two non-fictions in progress. She is the mother of nine, currently living in Minnesota. For more information, check her web site and blog.

***

Do circumstances make men, or do men make circumstances? I believe sometimes one and sometimes another.

Robert Bruce, Earl of Carrick, was born in 1274 into one of Scotland’s foremost noble families, in the last days of Alexander III’s golden reign of peace over Scotland. Bruce was the oldest of five sons and third of ten children. He is said to have been a bit headstrong, hot-tempered, and willful in his younger days. What would he have been, had Alexander had sons of his own? It’s very possible history would barely remember him.

As it was, Alexander, in a particularly tragic twist of fate, died of a broken neck exactly because of his haste to get home to his bride on a dark and stormy night. He didn’t reach her, and there was no heir.

Edward I of England had long had his eye on Scotland’s throne. Dispute broke out among thirteen competitors for the crown, including Robert Bruce’s grandfather. When Scotland’s nobles, fearing civil war, asked Edward to choose among the claimants, they unwittingly opened the door. Edward chose John Baliol, believing he’d chosen the one he’d best be able to control as a puppet king. Baliol, however, soon enough defied Edward, refusing to send troops for his war in France. This led to the events most Americans know through the movie Braveheart.

Like the American Revolution, the struggle of Robert the Bruce, William Wallace, and the Scottish people was that of a smaller, weaker country, poorer and more poorly-equipped, against what must have seemed a military giant in comparison. There must have been those who believed Scotland could never win. Perhaps the complete futility of the struggle is best seen in the words of Elizabeth de Burgh, Robert the Bruce’s queen, at their coronation in March of 1306: We are but king and queen of the May.

They were crowned in a rush, attended by only a few clerics and close friends. Bruce effectively had no country, no home, no castle of his own, and very little of an army to fight England. Scotland itself was in turmoil, with its nobles taking sides against one another.

If the situation looked bleak at the time of Robert and Elizabeth’s crowning, it soon grew worse. Bruce, with his few followers, his wife, daughter, sisters, four brothers, and the valiant Isabel MacDuff, took to the hills. He suffered military defeats at Methven and Dalry in the summer of 1306. When he sent the women to safety under the protection of his brother Nigel and his close friend Christopher Seton, they were betrayed: his wife, daughter, sisters, and Isabel captured and imprisoned, and Nigel and Christopher brutally executed. Bruce himself was largely a fugitive either living in the wilderness or relying on the hospitality of his subjects to house himself and his remaining followers.

After a brief disappearance from the pages of history — with several guesses as to where he spent that winter — he returned to attack the English in the southwest of Scotland. Of his three surviving brothers, two more, Thomas and Alexander, were captured and executed. His attempts to take Scotland back from the English had now resulted in the captivity of his wife, only daughter, and two sisters, and the gruesome deaths of three of his four brothers. He pressed onward, seeing that Scotland needed to be free of its oppressors, whatever the personal cost.

Edward Longshanks died in July 1307, and over the next seven years, between Edward II’s less than stellar leadership, and Bruce’s military genius, Bruce, a man born to castles and comfort, lived a life of hardship and warfare, steadily united his people, removed his internal enemies, and re-took his castles and country, until, in 1313, Stirling Castle was one of only a few remaining in English hands.

Here, Bruce’s remaining brother, Edward, steps into the picture. He was ordered to besiege Stirling. He did so, but being a man who preferred action to waiting games, he made a deal with the governor of Stirling. Philp de Mowbray, the governor, knew he couldn’t hold out forever. So he agreed that if Edward II did not send relief troops by the next midsummer’s day, he would hand the castle over to Edward Bruce.

Robert, in his fight against a larger and better-equipped country, had relied on guerrilla tactics. Edward’s agreement forced him into pitched battle, matching his small force head to head against England’s might. History argues over just how much larger England’s force was at Bannockburn, but Bruce knew it would be anywhere from three to five times the size of his own.

LauraVosikaBookCover1 It is into this world, in the days leading up to that battle, that Shawn Kleiner, modern-day musical phenomenon, wakes up, in my novel, Blue Bells of Scotland. Shawn is more brash and hotheaded even than Bruce in his younger days. He is a man who has created his own circumstances, tuned the world around him to his preferred pitch, and bulldozes through life heedless of anything but his own desires, demanding and getting what he wants. Suddenly, he finds himself in circumstances he can no longer control, in the midst of men with daggers and pitchforks who can’t be bullied into singing his tune. Will he rise to the occasion like Bruce?

History is full of people like Bruce, thrust into circumstances not of their own making, and in turn made into someone completely different by those circumstances. Bit by bit over the years, the hotheaded Bruce of youth become a man of careful thought, diplomacy, patience, and humility who would lead his people in one of Scotland’s greatest battles and against a great oppressor.

Some of us are good at making our own circumstances. And although we don’t expect hostile military takeovers in our country, such as Bruce faced, or to wake up in the wrong century like Shawn, all of us, invariably, will at some point be thrust into situations we can no longer control: a cheating spouse, a business partner who steals, divorce, layoffs, accidents, a sick child, and sometimes, wars, natural disasters and more.  What happens then?

Do we mourn our loss of control? Or do we allow those circumstances to turn us into someone greater than we would otherwise have been?

***

A big thanks to Laura Vosika for contributing. She’ll give away Blue Bells of Scotland in ebook form to someone who contributes a comment on my blog this week. I'll choose the winner from among those who comment by Friday at 6 p.m. ET and post the winner on Saturday.

The Winner of Death of a Dancing Master by M. E. Kemp

Shirley Nienkark has won a copy of Death of a Dancing Master by M. E. Kemp. Congrats, Shirley!

Thanks to M. E. Kemp for her entertaining look at the Puritans. And thanks to everyone who visited and commented on Relevant History this week. Watch for another Relevant History post, coming soon.

Worldbuilding and Writing from the Heart

Does the complexity of worldbuilding preclude the freedom of writing from the heart? An interesting question, posed last Saturday during a panel at the Cape Fear Crime Festival in Wilmington, NC.

At first glance, the task of linking technical details for worldbuilding looks daunting. I know this because my current, published series is historical suspense and mystery, and before that series, I’d written a contemporary crime fiction series and a science fiction series. Altogether, I’ve completed fourteen novel-length manuscripts.

Development of my characters drives my plots. When I write from the heart, I’m open to spontaneity, the unexpected. All I need to get rolling is a few benchmarks for my storyline. I turn my characters loose early in the first draft, and they find their way, growing and changing, past those benchmarks, to the end. Although I do incorporate some plotting, I’m much more of a “pantser.”

Consider the following facts, pulled from data that comprise the worldbuilding for each of my three series:

  • Crown forces, the 82nd Regiment of Foot, occupied Wilmington, NC from January until November of 1781.
  • Procedures that local law enforcement agencies follow when a murder is involved differ from those followed by state agencies.
  • The rocky planet of a Class G star just a little bigger than our sun must orbit out farther than 93 million miles to confer Earthlike conditions on the planet.

To me, worldbuilding components create an essential core — like a set of immovable system files on a computer’s hard drive. Those files must reside there, or the computer won’t operate. True, the files dictate what type of operating system the computer runs as well as what version of software programs the computer handles. To a small extent, that restricts my options.

But how I populate the remaining space of the hard drive, given the parameters of my computer’s system, is entirely up to me. A large enough hard drive holds many, many application programs.

Likewise, a large enough world vision holds many, many stories. The greater your imagination, the smaller the worldbuilding slice becomes in your overall vision of the “pie.”

Worldbuilding performed properly permits you the freedom to write in ways others cannot about inflammatory issues that score you deeply. It also allows you opportunities to explore unique characterizations, cultural permutations, and plot conflicts. Here’s how all that plays out for each worldbuilding fact that I listed above:

  • The Continental Army’s effectiveness in North Carolina is stymied for the year 1781, allowing redcoats to control the state.
  • Territorial spats erupt between two representatives of the local and state law enforcement agencies.
  • Warfare practices and religious rituals evolve that are based on the planet’s longer year and longer seasons.

In each situation, do you see how much room there is for spontaneity, the unexpected? Worldbuilding establishes certain plot elements as a baseline for me, so I don’t have to worry about those elements. Far from restricting my creativity, worldbuilding frees my imagination to do what it does best: develop my characters.

Worldbuilding doesn’t preclude writing from the heart. It enhances it.

The Dirty Truth About the Puritans: Debunking the Myths and Revealing Some Good-Time Charlies!

M.E. Kemp author photoRelevant History welcomes author M. E. Kemp. Kemp was born in Oxford, MA in 1713 — oops, that’s the year her ancestors settled the town. She lives in Saratoga Springs, NY where she touts horses in the racing season and writes historical mysteries on the side. She is married to Jack H. Rothstein, who keeps her “on track,” and lives with two kitties, Boris and Natasha, who act as editors tearing to shred her scripts — literally. For more information, check her web site.

*****

I write historical mysteries with two nosy Puritans as detectives. One of my tasks as a writer is to be historically accurate. Another is to dispel the many myths and false pictures of our colonial ancestors that are prevalent, even in the way the media portrays them today.

Far from the stern-faced skinny old stick-in-the-mud image, the typical Boston Puritan was a proud man strutting around in a scarlet cloak with a forest-green or perhaps a violet coat, embroidered waist coat, small clothes of various shades, and silk stockings with silver-buckled red shoes. And lace, plenty of exquisite lace falling from his collar and dripping from his sleeves. And that’s the men. (Men today could learn a thing or two about elegant dress from the old Puritans!) You can imagine that the women of New England would not be backwards in their attention to dress. From the earliest days women defied clothing restrictions and blossomed out in the latest fashions from Paris and London. Good sea-captain husbands helped out by bring back little dolls called “fashion babies” wearing the new fashions so the goodwives could study and share the dolls with neighbors. Colors ranged from bright to pastels, with scarlet being the favorite. Scarlet was such a bright warming color for a cold winter’s day — thus argued the Reverend Cotton Mather from his pulpit until a wealthy member of the congregation finally gave in and gifted him with such a cloak.

The one portrait I’ve found of a New England Puritan in black was of a handsome merchant dressed in a black velvet suit with a large, delicate lace collar covering his shoulders. (How I’d love to get my hands on lace like that!) His wife wears a sober olive dress — but her petticoat is bright red with gold embroidered trim. Even an old soldier wears an exquisite “fall” of lace at his throat while a battle rages outside his window. Dressed to kill? So much for the dowdy Puritans of myth!

The fine clothing covers a dirty little secret, though. Our ancestors were none too clean. If cleanliness is next to godliness, then our poor ancestors are groaning in H-E-double Hockey Sticks! And that just can’t be.

Oh, not that the Saints were saints; they ate prodigious amounts of food and drank even more prodigious amounts of hard liquor. Just check the tavern bills for a meeting of clergymen! I’ll bet on a Puritan minister over your biggest lush that the Puritan can out-drink the modern lush any day. Anyone who could down one of “Sparke’s Specials” — rum, beer, bread crumbs and molasses — must have a stomach of cast iron.

And as for sex, we forget that the early Puritans were actual Elizabethans, born and raised under that earthy Queen. The Puritans were probably more open about sex than we are today. They didn’t have the hang-ups, that’s for sure. One gentleman, accorded “a lusty big man,” bragged that he coveted the miller’s wife. He “coveted” her four times in one afternoon and was fined for it, no doubt with the secret envy of the magistrates. (I guess he must have been a lusty big man!) And there goes the joyless image of the Puritans.

My roaming rogue of a dancing master in Death of a Dancing Master isn’t so far off the mark! Unfortunately he meets a fatal end. There are plenty of suspects for my two nosy detectives to pursue — jealous husbands and deceiving wives, angry magistrates and sermonizing ministers. Death of a Dancing Master is based on a real incident, as are all my books, but in this case the real dancing master was merely harassed out of Boston. But then I wouldn’t have had a murder mystery to write, would I?

*****

Death of a Dancing Master book coverThanks to M. E. Kemp for the fun post! She offers to give away a print copy of Death of a Dancing Master to someone who contributes a comment on my blog this week. I’ll choose the winner from among those who comment by Friday at 6 p.m. ET. Delivery is available within the U.S. only.

**********

Did you like what you read? Learn about downloads, discounts, and special offers from Relevant History authors and Suzanne Adair. Subscribe to Suzanne’s free newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Relevant History

Thanks to feedback from my readers, I’m adding a semi-regular feature here on my blog called “Relevant History.”

History — relevant? No way. For most of us, high school history was boring and extraneous.

That’s why my guests will show you just how significant history is to people living in the 21st century. Expect surprises. Expect to find history fun, poignant, horrifying, and eye opening. You may win a prize.

But don’t take my word for it. Come back tomorrow. Read your first example of Relevant History.

Child Soldiers, Then and Now, Part 2

In the 14th Virginia Regiment of the Continental Army, twelve-year-old Private Joseph Moseley wore a uniform, carried a firearm that was probably taller than he was, and was paid six and two-thirds dollars per month. His two teenage brothers were also in the regiment. At home, the Moseley boys had left behind a mother widowed for eight years, and a brother and sister both younger than ten years old.

Joseph joined the 14th Virginia in early 1777. He was discharged after a year, in February 1778, just after his thirteenth birthday. During his year of service, the regiment participated in major battles: Brandywine and Germantown. Both battles were losses for the Continentals. Joseph may have endured winter camp at Valley Forge. He definitely saw morale in the Continental Army at its lowest point, before the French, the Spanish, the Dutch, and Baron von Steuben offered their aid and changed the course of the war.

Joseph Moseley was my great, great, great-grandfather. Until last week, when specific research details finally came to light, my family thought that Joseph had joined a militia unit as an older teen at the end of the war and spent a year performing low-profile duties for the men, such as gathering firewood, cleaning weapons, and digging latrines. We were stunned by the truth of a twelve-year-old boy in uniform who looked across battlefields at hundreds of disciplined redcoats with fixed bayonets.

Joseph's reasons for enlisting are among those found in the bulleted list from yesterday's post, disturbing echoes of the reasons why children enlist today. To imagine that he was the only child soldier in the Continental Army would be naïveté. He and countless other boys picked up the firearms of dead men and continued the fight for the Continentals. In doing so, they extended an armed conflict for six more years. And since our "Revolutionary War" was but one theater of a world war, the negative impact on the global economy was staggering.

Nations and factions have been using child soldiers for thousands of years. The effect on the children is a no-brainer. Joseph Moseley and the boys who fought at his side had no childhood. At the least, they suffered from some degree of post-traumatic stress disorder for the rest of their lives, even if they volunteered for duty and were discharged with no physical injuries.

Today's child soldiers in Africa, Asia, South America, and the Middle East are all of humanity's casualties. They show us the costs of war, no matter how hard we try to look elsewhere. The horrific imagery of child soldiers will continue to haunt us until we learn this lesson from history.

**********

Did you like what you read? Learn about downloads, discounts, and special offers from Relevant History authors and Suzanne Adair. Subscribe to Suzanne’s free newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Child Soldiers, Then and Now, Part 1

Among the most horrific, haunting images recorded from war around the globe are those of vacant-eyed children in their early teens or even younger holding semi-automatic weapons, perhaps garbed in a paramilitary unit's uniform. In the United States, these images batter a belief system that children should be in a nurturing home environment, enjoying the company of friends after school, taking clarinet lessons, playing softball. They should be allowed to be kids and dream.

Enlisting children as soldiers permits the extension of armed conflict long after a desperate nation or faction's supply of adult combatants has been exhausted. The global costs are astronomical. Although some children are forced to join armed groups, according to The Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers, the majority of these children volunteer for the following reasons:

  • Survival
  • Desire to avenge the death of relatives
  • Poverty and lack of access to education or work (thus the need for income)
  • Desire for power, status, and social recognition
  • Pressure from family or peers
  • Desire to honor a family tradition
  • Desire to escape domestic violence (and for girls an arranged marriage)

What does the topic of child soldiers have to do with the American War of Independence? In the United States, we tell ourselves that we don't put our young children in uniform, that such extreme measures happen elsewhere, in distant lands. But Americans have inherited the bloody legacy of young children in the military.

We have the "quaint" pictures of boys climbing ratlines on navy ships in the Civil War and the American War of Independence, and drummer boys in both wars. Or the not-so-quaint pictures of ragged civilian children traveling with an army unit as camp followers. Did children camp followers, musicians, and sailors escape the bullets and bayonets? No.

Children don't escape war.

In the autumn of 1776, two years into the American War of Independence, the fight was going poorly for the Continentals. A desperate Congress went to recruitment extremes, determined to raise an army of eighty-eight infantry regiments, intending that the regiments serve for the duration of the war. A boy named Joseph Moseley answered the recruitment call in March 1777 and enlisted as a Continental private in the newly made 14th Virginia Regiment. Joseph had just turned twelve years old.

I invite you to return to my blog tomorrow and learn his story.

**********

Did you like what you read? Learn about downloads, discounts, and special offers from Relevant History authors and Suzanne Adair. Subscribe to Suzanne’s free newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Crafting Dialogue in Historical Mystery and Suspense

Why do authors of historical mystery and suspense create dialogue the different ways they do? How do readers react to the dialogue? That’s the subject of my guest essay today on Lois Winston’s blog, “They Said What? Crafting Dialogue in Historical Mystery and Suspense.” Be sure to stop by and leave a comment. Lois will have a drawing, and I’ll give away a copy of Camp Follower to one of the visitors who posts a comment.

Special thanks to the readers on LibraryThing who responded to my discussion topic over the summer and gave me input for this article.

**********

Did you like what you read? Learn about downloads, discounts, and special offers from Relevant History authors and Suzanne Adair. Subscribe to Suzanne’s free newsletter.

Enter your email address: